ambientlight ([info]ambientlight) wrote,
@ 2008-04-02 13:59:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:meme

[meme] things i do not blog about, 2/3
[initial post]

from [info]aut2003: my ideal guy
(a phrase i would never have expected to appear on this lj, or indeed in anything i would ever write)

Note the given prompt. This is not about the sort of guy I'd be happy or even content with in a relationship, but rather my ~*~ideal~*~ guy, with all the wishful thinking and wholly unrealistic expectations that that implies.

Temperament is key, so let's start there. Laundry-list of attributes:
- Dry sense of humour, quick but not overly cruel wit.
- Relative lack of neuroses/hang-ups/Issues, but not so much that he is a robot. The ability to not take himself seriously, but with some degree of self-awareness as well.
- Introverted nature, but to a lesser degree than me. Someone has to initiate conversation, after all. And when I say 'introverted', I don't mean 'shy but enjoys company', I mean 'is perfectly happy being by themselves, needs to recharge after social events, and so on'. The first definition of introversion is one I personally reject, but I see it being used so much..! Anyway. Yes. He'll have to be socially competent, because one of us has to be.
- Related to the above: independence and lack of clinginess. I suppose he'd have to want me, at least a little, but I don't want to be needed.
- To use the laughably reductive vocabulary of the MBTI, he'll have to be a T, not an F.
- Some measure of kindness/empathy/generosity/not being a completely selfish cold-hearted bastard. But at the same time, no martyrs pls.
- Honesty and frankness, but with tact.
- General laid-back attitude to things, but not to the extent of apathy. He'll have to be interested in the world around him, and in societal issues.
- No chauvinism pls. And no old-fashioned chivalry, either. If he holds open doors it will be out of politeness and nothing more, and there will be no question of him paying for meals.
- Related to the above: a generally enlightened view on things.

And then we segue into opinions and preferences. Ideally he would be an atheist of the non-rabid variety, and hold fairly liberal political views. I wouldn't want us to agree on everything, though -- some intelligent, reasoned debate is required, for which he will also require intelligence and the ability to discuss things in a logical but not completely detached manner. Non-robot-ness is important. Preferences-wise, it would help if he had interesting tastes that overlapped just slightly with mine but included a variety of other stuff, in everything from food to music to anime/manga. Because, yes, my ideal guy would be an anime/manga fan. Sorry.

Finally, the shallow stuff. He'd have to be relatively attractive and in average physical shape, but not incredibly gorgeous or super athletic or anything. Nice warm hands with elegant fingers. A pleasant voice, and a pleasant laugh, and a smile that makes one's heart doki-doki -- but that must apply to the sort of smile which he smiles when he doesn't realise anyone is watching. He will not believe in silly money-wasting 'romantic gestures', but he will be unexpectedly sentimental and capable of some degree of emotion. (But not over-emotional, thanks.) He should be a cat person, and enjoy taking walks outdoors. He should not mind my refusal to wear make-up and skirts, etc. He should also lack a sex drive (ahaha, talk about unrealistic), but be fond enough of relatively chaste physical affection. He should be able to cook, and cook well. :D

In short, my ideal guy would probably be a male, better-adjusted, reasonably attractive, non-robotic, and overall improved version of myself, with added bonuses. Ahahaha um. -_-;; The self-love is strong with this one.



(Post a new comment)


[info]wao
2008-04-02 01:19 pm UTC (link)
I have to concur heartily on your requirement that your ideal guy should be a "cat person" - I think that kinda sums up the type of people I find myself attracted to in general. Definitely cat people. Not necessarily anti-dog, but certainly not a dog person. I don't know why.

The kind of ideal guy you mention sounds exactly like the kind of friend I wish I had in JC - really he sounds like someone who would make an excellent friend. I just so wish I had someone like that to talk to without having to worry about unnecessary things.
But maybe he's not someone I'd want to spend my life with; actually I doubt I'd want to spend my life with one person the whole time. Anyone applying for that position (this is just getting ridiculous) would have to live with a lot of unpleasantness...

edit: and well, they (or at least my mum) say that romantic love usually boils down to love of the self. Any time I find myself bordering on some sort of crush on real people I remind myself of this and just sigh at how much I like to indulge in my own ego (nothing that wrong with it as long as it doesn't get out of hand)

Edited at 2008-04-02 01:21 pm UTC

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ambientlight
2008-04-02 04:43 pm UTC (link)
dog people tend to be the more emotional/clingier sort, perhaps? [/stereotype]

and heh, i guess part of the problem i had with writing this is exactly that: i don't want a romantic partner, i just want a friend! :D;; i can't imagine myself spending my life with someone, either. perhaps that should be another requirement: my ideal guy should be willing enough to end the ~*~relationship~*~ eventually.

and hm, i hadn't really heard that point about romantic love = love of the self before, though i suppose it might not be that surprising. doesn't explain the 'opposites attract' cliche, though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aut2003
2008-04-02 03:06 pm UTC (link)
woah you really did a lot of thinking on this one.

"He should also lack a sex drive." hmm, this one i really cannot comprehend. haha. find a gay guy!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ambientlight
2008-04-02 04:47 pm UTC (link)
hahaha, i figured i might as well make it comprehensive, since i'm unlikely to address this issue ever again.

but it would be unfair to him! :p since gay guys generally have sex drives like everyone else, just that their sex drives would, er, drive them in another direction.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]aut2003
2008-04-02 04:53 pm UTC (link)
oh yeah. true. but well, wont be with you, which is the issue in the first place? haha

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ambientlight
2008-04-02 04:55 pm UTC (link)
hehe i guess. but no, i'd like someone who has no sex drive for anyone. like me, in other words. :p

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rost
2008-04-02 03:36 pm UTC (link)
"A pleasant voice, and a pleasant laugh, and a smile that makes one's heart doki-doki -- but that must apply to the sort of smile which he smiles when he doesn't realise anyone is watching."

I guess most of us are caught up on people who smile that way - myself, I'm also a sucker for a great smile, probably because of my inability to conjure up even one normal one. XD

And yes, I do agree that these entries aren't what I'd normally associate with you - but that is because I'm presumptious enough to think that I couldn't equate you with the contents of the posts. ^^;;

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ambientlight
2008-04-02 04:50 pm UTC (link)
ahaha i must admit that i wrote that line while thinking of a certain history teacher. :x :x :x he had that exact sort of smile during an end-of-year lesson in j2, and it was in fact the person sitting next to me (who, unlike me, did not have a slight crush on said teacher) who commented that "he has a really nice smile!" so um yes.

I couldn't equate you with the contents of the posts
ara? so are the post contents (as opposed to the post subjects) unexpected in themselves?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rost
2008-04-03 03:13 pm UTC (link)
Confession time, eh? =P

Nonono, how do I put it, argh. Disregarding the post subjects (which, like you've said, aren't things you'd normally blog about), maybe it's weird-sounding if I say this but I found it refreshing that your thoughts are pretty "straight", for want of a better word? Given your intellect I actually expected something much so-called harder to understand - and by that, I mean it in a good way, mind you.

Although your list of attributes your ideal guy should possess does fit with my image of you, so. ^^;;

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ambientlight
2008-04-03 03:19 pm UTC (link)
ah, i see. no, i'm afraid i operate on a very everyday level, intellectually. one teacher actually did mention that i tend to think in straight lines, which is good in the sense that it's relatively uncluttered, i suppose, but bad because i may neglect the subtleties of certain arguments. :D;;

and ahaha, so it's not just me, then. :D;; yeah, i personally don't subscribe to the 'opposites attract' theory.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]anappletree
2008-04-03 04:06 pm UTC (link)
Haha, Shikamaru sounds like he fits the bill!! If he didn't watch clouds so much :p

He belongs with Ino though XD

But yeah, I'm amazed that people actually know exactly what they're looking for, while I'm flitting from one Jpop idol to the next ^^;;

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ambientlight
2008-04-03 04:10 pm UTC (link)
ahaha, good point. although he's a little bit of a chauvinist, i think. :p

and it's not that i know exactly what i'm looking for (this was the first time i've ever had to consider the question!) especially since i'm not even looking in the first place. but it's easy enough to answer something like this since you don't have to be realistic. :D;;

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]anappletree
2008-04-03 05:14 pm UTC (link)
He is? :/

No chauvinism pls. And no old-fashioned chivalry, either. If he holds open doors it will be out of politeness and nothing more, and there will be no question of him paying for meals.

I'm a bit confused on this one. The difference between the last two is rather subtle. How do you know they're opening the door out of politeness not chivalry (is that the right word?) :p

Ah yes, you're right. My lack of insight into what I actually want is probably due to the fact that I'm not looking either lol.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ambientlight
2008-04-03 07:11 pm UTC (link)
i don't know, i think i vaguely got that impression? can't remember exactly why, though. maybe he says things like "cheh! women..." a lot, or something. *hasn't read the manga in ages*

i guess if they open doors for everyone and not just you? or, say, if you're walking slightly in front and about to open a door, he doesn't spring forward just to open it first. :D;;

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]anappletree
2008-04-04 12:40 pm UTC (link)
Oh I see. That would qualify many RI/RJC boys as chauvinists then?? :p

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ambientlight
2008-04-04 12:42 pm UTC (link)
lol, which part? do RI/RJC boys say "cheh! women..." a lot? :D;; if you're referring to the opening of doors, then no, that just makes them overly chivalrous. although i don't recall that being the case...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]anappletree
2008-04-04 12:58 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, they say "Cheh! Girls!" alot. My classmates did, at least :p And I had many more doors closing in my face than doors opening LOL.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ambientlight
2008-04-04 01:04 pm UTC (link)
ahaha. it depends on context lah, if they're not the "girls are weaker!!!" sort then it doesn't count.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…